You may have read my recent report for Al Jazeera on the view of Lord Carlile QC, a new member of the Bangladesh opposition leader’s legal team, about the conviction of Khaleda Zia, for embezzlement. If not, you can read it here. In summary he said that following a review of the relevant documents he had “not seen any evidence whatsoever that could justify prosecuting Begum Khaleda Zia, let alone convicting her”

Many people, quite understandably, will say that as a member of the defence team, the QC “would say that wouldn’t he.” That is of course a fair point. When I made that exact point to Carlile, he claimed that he was not saying this simply because he was part of Khaleda Zia’s legal team.

“When I was asked to look at case I made it clear to people involved that I would look at it in any normal way as any conscientious barrister would look at the case, and had there been sufficient evidence in this case, I would have so advised.”

I shall be writing more about the case tomorrow.

However, one notable point to make is that, the Bangladesh government is – at present – preventing Carlile from entering the country to attend Khaleda Zia’s appellate court hearing on 8 May. When I interviewed him on Thursday, he said that he had applied to the Bangladesh High Commission a couple of weeks earlier and personally attended the Commission. He said that he received

“a number of e-mails from a first secretary at the High Commission asking me questions that were completely irrelevant to my application – asking me if I had a license or permission from various entities in Bangladesh to do what I am intending to do – but all that I am intending to do is give private advice to a private client, and every Bangladesh citizen can get advice form any lawyer anywhere in world they like and of course they often do as there is so much trade between Bangladesh and the UK so it is inevitable that Bangladesh entities are getting commercial law advice on this. This has been pointed out to the First Secretary and has not been disagreed with and he has been provided with all information that he needs.”

He went onto day that

“I have not been refused a visa but the [Bangladesh High Commission] know perfectly well that I want to be there on 7 May so I can be present in court on 8th and they are playing for time. … I have not had a refusal, not had an acceptance, just this correspondence dance taking place.”

It should be noted when Sheikh Hasina was in custody during the two years emergency period 2007-9, she instructed two lawyers – a Canadian lawyer, Prof Payam Akhavan and the UK lawyer Cherie Blair -who were both allowed to enter Bangladesh, to attend court hearings and hold press conferences.*

Source — /bangladeshpolitico.blogspot.co.uk